Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A forum for discussing matters of moment, from a curmudgeonly perspective. (The ideas posted here do not necessarily represent those of any organization with which I am a part). Rude and insulting remarks will not be published, but civil disagreement is welcome.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(514)
-
▼
February
(33)
- Groothuis on Blaise Pascal
- Missing
- Three More Books...
- The Rocky Mountain News: RIP
- Ronald Nash on Capitialism and the Bible
- A Fruitful Omission: Forgetting a Book and Learnin...
- Rethink Obama's Claim
- Discrepencies
- Monk's Loft
- "The Anti-Bono" (from The New York Times)
- Tiptoe Through the Tulip
- Wells on Charles
- There is a God
- Truth and Freedom
- TV Togetherness
- The unfairness of the fairness doctrine
- Theological and Apologetic Classic
- Bambi Meets Godzilla, II
- Darwinism and Intelligent Design in America Today
- Pray, Act for Sri Lankan Christians
- Lament for a Lost Friend: Gary Lewis
- Ministry Principles from Chinese Underground Church
- A Few Thoughts on the "Stimulus Package"
- Creative Exile
- Worldliness: A Preliminary Prod
- William Ayers in Kings Sooper
- Ecclesiastes 9:11 (King James)
- Apocalypse Delayed
- A New Nadir: "Arranged Marriage" TV Show
- Never Give Up
- Corrupt Officials Brought In
- "Evidence"--Gazing into...
- Super Bowl Sunday
-
▼
February
(33)
Links
About Me
- Douglas Groothuis, Ph.D.
- Nothing on this blog represents the position of Denver Seminary. I am a Christian, philosopher, teacher, writer, and preacher, who is Professor of Philosophy at Denver Seminary. My most recent of my twelve books is Philosophy in Seven Sentences. My magnum opus is Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith (InterVarsity Press, 2011). I have published ten others, including Truth Decay and On Jesus. I direct the Christian Apologetics and Ethics MA program at Denver Seminary.
2 comments:
I saw a special on PBS last night talking about Lincoln. They had a guy on there who wrote some book about how incredible it is that Lincoln and Darwin had the same birthday. In his thinking, they are "so much alike", referring to freedom and liberties and progress.
Apparently what this author neglected was worldview; of which Lincoln and Darwin could not be further apart. It's all about the WHY people want freedom, liberties and progress.
There are lots of fierce rebuttals to this article where the use of logical fallacies run rampant. Some notable ones are Poisoning the Well and Ad Hominem. What are your thoughts about the contention of a lack of "peer reviewed" articles on ID?
Post a Comment