Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
Friday, June 25, 2010
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Art, Self, and Love
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Doug Groothuis speaking in Longmont
This coming Wednesday at 12:15 (June 23), Dr. Douglas Groothuis, a philosophy professor at Denver Seminary will teach on counterfeit spirituality vs. Biblical spirituality. On the 30th, his last session, he will speak on postmodernism. We will be taking a love offering to help cover Dr. Groothuis’ expenses.
We will be meeting at Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. on 4th and Main in the Community Room. The Bank is across the street just north of our office. The Community Room is on the second floor to the left of the stairs/elevator (on the east side). If possible, please park behind our building or in the parking lot at the former Wachovia Bank building (4th and Coffman) to keep the Bank parking lot for their customers.
The Sonnesyn Law Firm
655 4th Avenue, Suite B
Longmont, Colorado 80501
Contemporary Philosophy at Denver Seminary
Friday, June 18, 2010
No cross worth its cruciformity
will brook conformity
with the enormity of normality
in an abnormal world.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
This is from "Notes to 'Jasmine,'" written by Keith Jarrett for "Jasmine," the exquisite new ECM release by Jarrett and acoustic bassist Charlie Haden:
Monday, June 07, 2010
Saturday, June 05, 2010
Book Review: The Making of an Atheist
James S. Spiegel, The Making of an Atheist: How Immorality Leads to Unbelief
Philosopher James Spiegel has written a clear, biblically-informed, philosophically-astute and well-documented account of the ultimate origins of atheism. Unbelief, he argues, is not attributable to a lack of evidence for God. Rather, the problem is fixed in human rebellion against God himself, just as Paul explained in the first chapter of Romans. This book provides a much needed dimension of analysis in light of all the press received in the past few years by “new atheists” such as Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris.
Some of those who believe that atheism is rooted more in rebellion than in argument foreswear the need for any constructive case for theism or for particular Christian beliefs. Not so for Professor Spiegel. Instead, he argues that the evidence supports theism (the laws of nature, the existence of the universe, and the emergence of life) and that naturalism is self-defeating since it cannot account for human rationality (summarizing Alvin Plantinga’s argument). But positive apologetics is not the main purpose of his book. Spiegel aptly summarizes his book’s thesis on pages 113-114.
"The descent into atheism is caused by a complex of moral-psychological factors, not a perceived lack of evidence for God’s existence. The atheist willfully rejects God, though this is precipitated by immoral indulgences and typically a broken relationship with his or her father. Thus, the choice of the atheist paradigm is motivated by non-rational factors, some of which are psychological and some of which are moral in nature.
The hardening of the atheist mind-set occurs through cognitive malfunction due to two principle causes. First, atheists suffer from paradigm-induced blindness, as their worldview inhibits their ability to recognize the reality of God that is manifest in creation. Second, atheists suffer from damage to their sensus divinitatis [the sense for God’s existence], so their natural awareness of God is severely impeded. Both of these mechanisms are aspects of the noetic effects of sin."
After articulating the intellectual and moral errors of atheism, Spiegel concludes with a brief but insightful chapter called “The Blessings of Theism.” Here he explains that Christian theists can develop intellectual and moral virtues and live honestly before God. They are free to both complain to God and praise God. All aspects of the human personality can be offered to a personal and moral Creator, thus insuring human flourishing in ways impossible for atheism. Atheism is simply incompatible with a life well-lived (shalom).
Atheists may complain that Spiegel is poisoning the well or begging the question against the unbeliever, that he simply assumes theism and then dismisses atheism as something morally and intellectually defective. This is not so. Contrariwise, as mentioned, Spiegel does not disavow arguments for theism; but instead of pursuing that (very common) route, he considers the psychology of atheism from the vantage point of biblical theism. (In this, his book is similar to R.C. Sproul’s earlier work, The Psychology of Atheism; later republished as If There is a God, Why are There Atheists? as well as Kierkegaard’s The Sickness Unto Death.) The atheist who reads this book is therefore enjoined to consider whether or not the biblical explanation of the origin, nature, and continuation of his unbelief may, in fact, ring true.
Thursday, June 03, 2010
Lakewood, CO 80123-1358