Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A forum for discussing matters of moment, from a curmudgeonly perspective. (The ideas posted here do not necessarily represent those of any organization with which I am a part). Rude and insulting remarks will not be published, but civil disagreement is welcome.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(254)
-
▼
March
(34)
- "Getting serious about pornography."
- Hanson on Obama
- "The democracy will cease to exist when you take a...
- Some of my best friends are robots
- Infiltration
- Time to read The Abolition of Man Again!
- No title
- Steyn on "The Nationalization of Your Body"
- From Americans United for Life
- Fatal Choice
- Apologetics Lectures Now in Video
- The Tail and the Face
- From the Book of Common Prayer
- The Beast?
- Van Gogh
- An Argument to End the Regime
- Prayer for Congress
- Noonan on O
- Personhood Amendment
- The Urantia Book
- Epistemology in Moby Dick
- Three Wishes
- Truth, Knowledge, and Comparative Worldviews
- Doug Groothuis lectures on Postmodernism and Apolo...
- Obama's Tantrum
- From The New York Times: Scientology
- From The Wall Street Journal
- Limits, Oh Limits
- Protocol
- Scientific Confirmation for the Beginning of the U...
- A Critique of Ken Wilber
- D. Groothuis on the New Age (Again)
- Michael Shermer, "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Aga...
- Michael Behe on "Inside the Human Genome: A Case f...
-
▼
March
(34)
Links
About Me
- Douglas Groothuis, Ph.D.
- Nothing on this blog represents the position of Denver Seminary. I am a Christian, philosopher, teacher, writer, and preacher, who is Professor of Philosophy at Denver Seminary. My most recent of my twelve books is Philosophy in Seven Sentences. My magnum opus is Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith (InterVarsity Press, 2011). I have published ten others, including Truth Decay and On Jesus. I direct the Christian Apologetics and Ethics MA program at Denver Seminary.
1 comment:
I always find it perplexing that scientists chastise theologians/philosophers for talking about science. Yet it's okay for scientists to talk about theology/philosophy (the problem of evil) in an authoritative manner. If nothing else it's hypocrisy.
Post a Comment