Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A forum for discussing matters of moment, from a curmudgeonly perspective. (The ideas posted here do not necessarily represent those of any organization with which I am a part). Rude and insulting remarks will not be published, but civil disagreement is welcome.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(514)
-
▼
September
(42)
- The Unsafe World of Barack Obama
- Doug Groothuis Podcast
- "Christianity and Gender"
- Arguing with Idiots
- Isaiah 64:1-9
- Letter to Chronicle
- Dan Brown, Science, and Christianity
- Book Review: The Signature in the Cell
- Design in Mind, not Matter
- Dawkins Video
- Sen. McConnell For Free Speech--Against Obama
- How Not to Think About Science and Christianity
- Speech
- Tips for Writing Philosophy Papers
- Book Writing
- The Meaning of Blog Banishment
- So
- Not in the National Interest
- Public Speaking by Doug Groothuis
- ID in CO
- From Christians for Biblical Equality--Denver
- Groothuis in Francis Schaeffer
- Cyber What?
- Jane Norton for Senate
- Cyber Church?
- Do the Math
- Slaughter of the Dissidents
- Dan Brown, the Icky Poo, and Rapid Cultural Response
- Brigitte Gabriel at Colorado Christian University
- Abortion, Paid by Your Taxes
- Warning!
- A Lament Over Defection
- Dan Brown's Erroneous World
- Doug Groothuis Sermon in Centennial
- The Arrogance
- The Outrageous Imposture of Contemporary Televisio...
- Air Apologetics
- C.S. LEWIS ON OBJECTIVE VALUE
- Brigitte Gabriel in Denver
- From the Summer-Fall, Denver Seminary Magazine
- Endowed Award
-
▼
September
(42)
Links
About Me
- Douglas Groothuis, Ph.D.
- Nothing on this blog represents the position of Denver Seminary. I am a Christian, philosopher, teacher, writer, and preacher, who is Professor of Philosophy at Denver Seminary. My most recent of my twelve books is Philosophy in Seven Sentences. My magnum opus is Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith (InterVarsity Press, 2011). I have published ten others, including Truth Decay and On Jesus. I direct the Christian Apologetics and Ethics MA program at Denver Seminary.
7 comments:
I scrolled it up and down for many times, but couldn't find your reply. How did you respond?
I am comment #62.
Now you went and did it . . . I watched most of the video and left some comments. Ugh. Such bad thinking there!
Are you sure? Maybe the link goes to wrong post if it supposed to be "faith and science" instead of "faith vs. evidence" (where's just a short video). Anyway #62 is "ndt" and he doesn't sound like you at all.
Good replies. The two major flaws I got in the rambling argument before losing interest was
1) assuming God is just another object X doesn't make Him so. He is not just a thing. Romans 11:33-36 describes God as the reason anything exists..and
2)that God is unchanging in His mind doesn't preclude intelligence. That He doesn't change His mind is because He doesn't have to; He's the one mind that doesn't need changing. Also, just because He doesn't equivocate doesn't mean He can't interact with His creation.
If I may be so bold as to mention it, I have another review of this video (posted last Saturday) at http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2009/09/the-final-answer-to-all-theistic-arguments/ .
well said (and at the moment I looked you were comment #63).
Post a Comment