Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A forum for discussing matters of moment, from a curmudgeonly perspective. (The ideas posted here do not necessarily represent those of any organization with which I am a part). Rude and insulting remarks will not be published, but civil disagreement is welcome.
3 comments:
Tallis writes, "If there isn't an evolutionary explanation of consciousness, then the world is more interesting than biologists would allow."
James Le Fanu comes to a very similar conclusion in his recent book Why Us? How Science Rediscovered the Mystery of Ourselves.
Their works, interestingly enough, focus on separate but complementary "crises" in any strict materialist explanation of consciousness. Le Fanu takes as the "crisis" not the problematic emergence of consciousness (as Tallis does here), but the actual facts of how the human mind works based on the current state of brain science.
Materialists will never realize that they have it backwards. Matter reduces to Mind, not the other way around!
The scientist tossing out “mind” is sort of like the mathematician tossing out “infinity”, and re-writing all his equations accordingly.
As Bertrand Russell's grand-mother purportedly said, "What is mind - never matter ... what is matter - never mind."
Post a Comment