A forum for discussing matters of moment, from a curmudgeonly perspective. (The ideas posted here do not necessarily represent those of any organization with which I am a part). Rude and insulting remarks will not be published, but civil disagreement is welcome.
1. I thought Keller did a fairly good job. It is not superficial, although there are more than a few errors in documentation--small, but real.
2. Craig should have mentioned Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism. The Van Til version has no real purchase in scholarly circles, though. Lewis's version, does have some, however. See Vic Reppert's work on that.
Doug,
ReplyDeleteHave you read Tim Keller's recent bok The Reason for God? I've found it to be an excellent apologetic resource.
There's a clip on YouTube of Keller giving a talk at Google about his book which illustrates much of the material.
I noticed Dr. Craig neglected the Transcendental Argument for God.
ReplyDelete1. I thought Keller did a fairly good job. It is not superficial, although there are more than a few errors in documentation--small, but real.
ReplyDelete2. Craig should have mentioned Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism. The Van Til version has no real purchase in scholarly circles, though. Lewis's version, does have some, however. See Vic Reppert's work on that.
Thanks for the tip.
ReplyDelete