A prophet
in a muzzle
is a puzzle.
A prophet
on the docket
is a rocket.
A prophet
in a corporation
is a consternation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A forum for discussing matters of moment, from a curmudgeonly perspective. (The ideas posted here do not necessarily represent those of any organization with which I am a part). Rude and insulting remarks will not be published, but civil disagreement is welcome.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(246)
-
▼
December
(22)
- DVDs and Early Onset Dementia
- Concluding Benediction for 2007
- Space, Room, Silence
- "Woe to you..." --Matthew 23.
- Top Ten Bad Events of 2007 (corrected)
- Six Wrong Reasons to Give (Title Correction)
- Prophetic Modes
- Groothuis on Flew: There is a God After All
- How I Became a Philosopher: Installment One
- "Lost"
- Constructive Curmudgeon Reviews "Crazy for God" by...
- Slavery in the US
- The Dark Loneliness of the Chronically Ill: A Chal...
- Suffering and Listening
- A Hospital Chapel: 30 Minutes
- Fasting
- Prayer, Fasting, and Suffering
- Resources on "The Golden Compass"
- The Witch Trial of Dr. Gonzalez
- The Kindle Challenge
- Sex in Robo-space
- An Atheist Who Wants Atonement: The Testimony of H...
-
▼
December
(22)
Links
About Me
- Douglas Groothuis, Ph.D.
- Nothing on this blog represents the position of Denver Seminary. I am a Christian, philosopher, teacher, writer, and preacher, who is Professor of Philosophy at Denver Seminary. My most recent of my twelve books is Philosophy in Seven Sentences. My magnum opus is Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith (InterVarsity Press, 2011). I have published ten others, including Truth Decay and On Jesus. I direct the Christian Apologetics and Ethics MA program at Denver Seminary.
2 comments:
Interesting! If I understand your intent here, these aren't mutually exclusive, are they? A muzzled prophet in a corporation would perhaps be a consternation hidden in a puzzle. Who would know or be able to perceive? Could he a be a test or a judgment yet possibly even not of his own understanding, but only of the One for whom he silently prophesies. After all, that which you did not do unto the least of these...
I got you thinking! That was the point.
Post a Comment