tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14410967.post115826516267939229..comments2024-03-25T19:00:40.046-06:00Comments on The Constructive Curmudgeon: Jonathan Wells to Debate on the Michael Medved ShowDouglas Groothuis, Ph.D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/08766692378954258034noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14410967.post-1159508506123559332006-09-28T23:41:00.000-06:002006-09-28T23:41:00.000-06:00Lowdown on Wells: http://scienceblogs.com/loom/20...Lowdown on Wells: http://scienceblogs.com/loom/2006/09/28/let_evolution_be_your_guide.phpEd Darrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10056539160596825210noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14410967.post-1158362204946835282006-09-15T17:16:00.000-06:002006-09-15T17:16:00.000-06:00This was quite a narrow conversation, not much dev...This was quite a narrow conversation, not much development of the arguments on either side. <BR/><BR/>Too many commercials and interruptions.<BR/><BR/>Most of Moonie's arguments were responded with a "that's not true" by Wells, but he did not have the opportunity to develop explanations.<BR/><BR/>One caller asked "name one single experiment that proves [macro]evolution" and Moonie said exactly what I believe is true of ID. He said something to the effect of "It is believed as true by science due to an accumulation of evidences and observations, there is not one single test to prove it because it is so multi-faceted".<BR/><BR/>Yeah, that's why I believe you can test for ID as well. What Dr. G calls "the cumulative case argument".<BR/><BR/>It was also interesting that most of the callers were pro-ID.Craig Fletcherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04732332673826674158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14410967.post-1158351494984550642006-09-15T14:18:00.000-06:002006-09-15T14:18:00.000-06:00My link is wrong, go here!http://www.1220knts.com/...My link is wrong, go here!<BR/><BR/>http://www.1220knts.com/listenlive.aspxCraig Fletcherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04732332673826674158noreply@blogger.com